The Image of Yahuah

A Study of What Adam Lost, What the Beast Counterfeits, and What the Second Adam Restored

From the Image of God to the Image of His Son

• • •

“And as we have borne the image of the earthy, we shall also bear the image of the heavenly.” — 1 Corinthians 15:49

Introduction

The first thing Scripture tells us about man is that he was made in the image of Yahuah. It is the founding statement of who we are. Every truth that follows in the Bible — sin, redemption, the new birth, the resurrection — depends on what those four words mean.

Most readers picture something vague when they hear “image of God.” Maybe a soul. Maybe the ability to think and choose. Maybe a moral conscience. But the Hebrew and Greek words Scripture actually uses paint a much sharper picture, and they tell a much bigger story.

The story goes like this. Adam wore the image of Yahuah in the garden. At the fall, he lost it. From that day forward, every child born of natural generation has worn the image of fallen Adam instead — the image Scripture goes on to call the image of the beast. The Second Adam, Yahushua, came to put the lost image back on every man who trusts Him. The rest of this study walks through each of those four moves and shows what Scripture means by them.

Part I — The Image and the Sonship

Scripture uses four main words for image — two in Hebrew and two in Greek. Each one shows the same idea from a slightly different angle: a bearer that represents a source while remaining distinct from it. The image carries the form, the authority, and the dignity of the source. The image is not the source.

The Two Hebrew Words

צֶלֶם (tselem) — Image, statue, representation. The word ancient kings used for the statue they set up in a distant city. The statue was not the king, but it bore his form and stood for his authority. To deface the statue was to dishonor the king.

דְּמוּת (demuth) — Likeness, pattern, resemblance. The word that lets you say “this is like that.” When Ezekiel sees the throne, he uses this word again and again — what he saw was the likeness of a man, not the man himself.

When Genesis 1:26 says Yahuah made man in His tselem, after His demuth, both words are working together. Adam was the visible representation and the underlying pattern of the Father. Two angles. One reality.

The Two Greek Words

εἰκών (eikōn) — Image, portrait, stamped impression. The same word used for Caesar’s face on a Roman coin. The coin was not Caesar. But it bore his face and his authority, and because of that it belonged to him.

χαρακτήρ (charaktēr) — Engraved impression, exact stamp. The mark a signet ring leaves in soft wax. Every line of the ring is in the wax. But the wax is wax, and the ring is metal. The impression and the engraver are not the same thing.

Four words. One idea. The image bears the source. The image is not the source. Hold that in your mind as the foundation of everything that follows.

Where the Pictures Fall Short

Here is where modern readers stumble. A statue does not have a soul. A coin does not have a nature. A wax impression cannot fall from righteousness. So how can Genesis 5:3 say Seth was begotten in Adam’s image — meaning Seth inherited Adam’s sinful nature — if the word “image” only refers to outward form?

The answer is in the Hebrew way of thinking. The biblical image is not a statue. It is sonship. A son bears his father’s image in every dimension at once — face, voice, name, nature, authority, inheritance, character. All of it together, in one word.

Luke 3:38 — “Which was the son of Enos, which was the son of Seth, which was the son of Adam, which was the son of Elohim.”

Notice what Luke does. He traces the line of Yahushua all the way back, and he ends with this: Adam was the son of Yahuah. Not figuratively. The same way Seth was the son of Adam — that is the way Adam was the son of Yahuah. The genealogy treats both relationships the same. Adam’s sonship to the Father and Seth’s sonship to Adam are the same kind of relationship at different levels.

Here is the key. Genesis 5:1 says Yahuah made Adam in His demuth — Yahuah fathered Adam as His son. Genesis 5:3 says Adam begat Seth in his own demuth, after his tselem — Adam fathered Seth as his son. Father to son. The image is what passes from father to son. The image is the sonship itself.

Once you see this, everything opens up. The statue picture is the starting illustration. Sonship is the full meaning. A son carries his father’s whole identity at once — outward and inward, body and nature, name and inheritance. That is what the image is.

Part II — The Original Image, and How It Was Lost

Genesis 1:26–27 — “And Elohim said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth. So Elohim created man in his own image, in the image of Elohim created he him; male and female created he them.”

Adam was made as the Father’s son in the garden. His body bore the form Yahuah designed. His glory shone outward. His role was dominion — ruling creation on the Father’s behalf. His communion was direct — walking with the Father in the cool of the day. His nature was righteous. Body, glory, role, relationship, righteousness — all of it together. That was the image. That was the sonship.

Genesis 5:1 — “This is the book of the generations of Adam. In the day that Elohim created man, in the likeness of Elohim made he him.”

Notice what Moses does at the head of Adam’s family record. He restates the image. Whatever Adam passes down to his sons, the image is the inheritance. The very next verses tell us what happened to that inheritance.

The Quiet Shift in Genesis 5:3

Between Genesis 5:1 and Genesis 5:3, something has happened. The text does not retell it. It already told us in chapter three. The fall has occurred. Adam has eaten. The ground is cursed. The glory-covering has lifted. The communion has broken. Then Adam begets his first son after the fall. Watch the language.

Genesis 5:3 — “And Adam lived an hundred and thirty years, and begat a son in his own likeness, after his image; and called his name Seth.”

Read those two verses side by side. Genesis 5:1 — Yahuah made Adam in His own demuth. Genesis 5:3 — Adam begat Seth in his own demuth, after his tselem. The exact same two Hebrew words. The source has changed. Yahuah made Adam in His image. Adam made Seth in his.

Notice what the text does NOT say. It does not say Seth was made in Yahuah’s image. It does not say Seth was made partly in Adam’s and partly in Yahuah’s. It says one thing only — Seth was made in Adam’s image. The image-bearing line has shifted. The source Adam reproduces is himself, not Yahuah. The sonship that flowed down to Seth was sonship of Adam, not sonship of the Father. Until the Second Adam came, the line of sonship to Yahuah was broken at Genesis 5:3 and was never re-established by natural generation.

This is what David grieved over in Psalm 51:5 — “Behold, I was shapen in iniquity; and in sin did my mother conceive me.” This is what Paul declared in Romans 5:12 — by one man sin entered into the world, and death by sin, and so death passed upon all men. The entire human race after Adam was born in Adam’s image, not Yahuah’s. Every man bears the resemblance of the fallen father, not the original Father. That is the condition we are all born into.

What About Genesis 9:6, James 3:9, and 1 Corinthians 11:7?

Three later verses are sometimes used to argue that fallen man still bears Yahuah’s image. Genesis 9:6 forbids murder “for in the image of Elohim made he man.” James 3:9 forbids cursing men “which are made after the similitude of Elohim.” 1 Corinthians 11:7 says a man is “the image and glory of Elohim.” Do these verses overturn what we have just seen?

Look at the verbs. All three reach back to the original creative act. Genesis 9:6 uses the Hebrew verb asah — “made.” James 3:9 uses the Greek perfect participle gegonotas — “those who have been made.” 1 Corinthians 11:7 uses Paul’s typical Adam-typology, grounding present order in the way man was created. None of these verses says fallen man is currently bearing the image of Yahuah in the way Adam did before the fall. What they say is that the original design carries dignity, and that dignity is the basis for the rule. You do not murder a man, because of how Yahuah originally made him. You do not curse a man, because of how Yahuah originally made him. The verses ground a present command in a past creative act. They do not contradict Genesis 5:3. They presuppose it.

Part III — The Image of the Beast

Scripture does not leave the fallen image unnamed. The apostles and prophets give it a name. They call it the image of the beast. This is not just a future statue in a future temple. It is the corrupted image humanity has been bearing since the fall, and it stands in direct opposition to the image of Yahuah.

Romans 1 — The Great Exchange

Romans 1:21–23 — “Because that, when they knew Elohim, they glorified him not as Elohim, neither were thankful; but became vain in their imaginations, and their foolish heart was darkened. Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools, and changed the glory of the uncorruptible Elohim into an image made like to corruptible man, and to birds, and four-footed beasts, and creeping things.”

Paul describes what fallen humanity did with the image. The word “changed” (allassō in Greek) is the word for a transaction — something given up, something received in its place. The original glory was traded. Man took the image he was meant to bear and exchanged it for an image like corruptible man, like birds, like beasts, like creeping things.

Now look at the categories Paul lists. Man, birds, four-footed beasts, creeping things. Those are the exact categories of created life over which Adam was given dominion in Genesis 1. The hierarchy inverted. The would-be image-bearer began bearing the image of what he was meant to rule. This is the image of the beast at its root — the corrupted Adamic image that wears the form of the creature instead of the form of the Father.

Daniel — The Image of the Kingdoms

Daniel chapters 2 and 3 show the same principle worked out in politics. Nebuchadnezzar dreams of a great image — the Aramaic word is tselem, the same word from Genesis — representing the kingdoms of men. Four kingdoms in succession, all built on human empire apart from Yahuah. The original image was Adam, ruling under the Father. The corrupted image is a metal statue, ruling apart from the Father.

Then in Daniel 3, Nebuchadnezzar sets up a golden tselem and commands every nation to bow. This is the prototype of every image-of-the-beast event in Scripture. A counterfeit image is set up. Worship is demanded. Those who refuse face the furnace. Daniel’s three friends refuse — and the same Yahuah who delivered them in the fire is the One who delivers His faithful remnant in every age. The pattern repeats wherever the beast system rises.

Revelation — Two Marks, Two Foreheads

Revelation gathers every thread. The beast and the false prophet set up an image of the beast and demand worship (Revelation 13:14–15). Those who worship the image receive the mark of the beast on their hand or forehead (Revelation 13:16). And those who refuse — the faithful — have something different on their foreheads.

Revelation 14:1 — “And I looked, and, lo, a Lamb stood on the mount Sion, and with him an hundred forty and four thousand, having his Father’s name written in their foreheads.”

Two images. Two marks. Two destinations. This is the working out of the principle Moses first showed us in Genesis 5:3. Every human being bears one image or the other. The natural birth puts the fallen Adamic image on every person. The new birth puts the Father’s image — restored through the Son — back onto every believer. There is no third option.

Part IV — The Image Restored in the Messiah

Several verses in the New Testament call Yahushua the image of Yahuah. Trinitarians lean on these verses to argue that Yahushua is Yahuah Himself, or shares Yahuah’s essence as a second Person of a triune godhead. But these verses, when you read them in context with the word-study we have just done, teach something very different. They teach that Yahushua is the Second Adam — the man who succeeded at the image-bearing role the first Adam failed. He is the perfect bearer of the Father’s image. He is not the Father.

We will walk through four of the most important passages. For each one, we will place what Trinitarians read against what the text actually says, so the difference is clear.

Colossians 1:15 — The Firstborn

Colossians 1:15 — “Who is the image of the invisible Elohim, the firstborn of every creature.”

The Trinitarian Reading. Yahushua is called the image of the invisible Elohim and the “firstborn of every creature.” This proves He has always existed — the eternal second Person of the godhead, of the same essence as the Father, who was there before all creation.

What the Text Actually Says. Read three verses further. Paul defines his own word. “He is the head of the body, the church: who is the beginning, the firstborn from the dead” (Colossians 1:18). “Firstborn” here means resurrection priority, not pre-existence. Yahushua is the first man of the new humanity, the prototype of the resurrected — the perfect image-bearer the first Adam was supposed to be.

Think about this. Genesis 1:27 says Adam was made in the eikōn of Yahuah. That is the same Greek word Paul uses for Yahushua in Colossians 1:15. If “image of God” makes Yahushua deity, it makes Adam deity too. There is no honest way to give the phrase one meaning in one place and a completely different meaning in another.

2 Corinthians 4:4 — The Light of the Knowledge

2 Corinthians 4:4 — “In whom the god of this world hath blinded the minds of them which believe not, lest the light of the glorious gospel of Messiah, who is the image of Elohim, should shine unto them.”

The Trinitarian Reading. Yahushua is the image of Yahuah — His face is Yahuah’s glory made visible (verse 6). To see Yahushua is to see Yahuah Himself, because He is Yahuah in human form.

What the Text Actually Says. Paul is contrasting two image-systems. The god of this age blinds men so they cannot see the Father’s glory shining through the Second Adam. To look at the face of Yahushua (verse 6) is to see the perfect image of the invisible Father — not the Father Himself, but the man who finally bears the Father’s image without corruption.

Hebrews 1:3 — The Engraved Impression

Hebrews 1:3 — “Who being the brightness of his glory, and the express image of his person, and upholding all things by the word of his power, when he had by himself purged our sins, sat down on the right hand of the Majesty on high.”

The Trinitarian Reading. Yahushua is the “express image” of the Father’s person — the exact representation of His being. This proves He is co-equal, co-eternal, of the same divine essence as the Father.

What the Text Actually Says. Look at the Greek word — charaktēr. That is the impression a signet ring leaves in wax. The wax bears the exact form of the ring, every line and every detail. But the wax is not the ring. The impression cannot be the engraver. The verse confirms this in its own words — Yahushua sat down at the right hand of the Majesty on high. The engraver and the impression are not the same Person. They sit beside each other.

Philippians 2:6–7 — The Form of God

Philippians 2:6–7 — “Who, being in the form of Elohim, thought it not robbery to be equal with Elohim: but made himself of no reputation, and took upon him the form of a servant, and was made in the likeness of men.”

The Trinitarian Reading. Yahushua existed in the form of Yahuah before His incarnation. He gave up His divinity to become a man. This proves the pre-existence of the Son as a second Person of the godhead who temporarily emptied Himself.

What the Text Actually Says. Morphē means outward form, not divine essence. Mark 16:12 settles this — the risen Yahushua appeared in “another morphē.” His nature had not changed. His appearance had. Then look at the next clause. He thought it not robbery — harpagmos in Greek, the word for grasping — to be equal with Yahuah. This is the direct opposite of the first Adam, who DID grasp at equality (Genesis 3:5 — “ye shall be as Elohim”). The Second Adam refused to grasp. And the Father exalted Him for it (verse 9). You cannot exalt someone already at the highest possible position.

Hold these four passages together and the picture is plain. The first Adam grasped at equality with Yahuah and lost the image he had. The Second Adam refused to grasp at equality with Yahuah and was exalted by Him. He is the perfect image-bearer the first Adam was supposed to be. He bears the Father’s whole likeness — outward and inward, form and nature, glory and obedience. And He does it as a man, distinct from the Father, sent by the Father, exalted by the Father.

Part V — The Image Restored in You

Yahushua came as the sinless Second Adam to restore the image of Yahuah onto every man who trusts Him. The sonship that broke at Genesis 5:3 is re-established through His work. But here is what most Christians miss. The restoration is not a slow self-improvement project. It is not a gradual climb toward holiness that gets you the image at the end. It happens at the new birth. All at once. The moment a man believes.

The New Birth Is Becoming a Son Again

John 1:12–13 — “But as many as received him, to them gave he power to become the sons of Elohim, even to them that believe on his name: which were born, not of blood, nor of the will of the flesh, nor of the will of man, but of Elohim.”

Read those words slowly. The believer receives power to become a son of Yahuah. Not by a physical birth. Not of blood. Not of the flesh. Not of the will of man. By a different kind of birth — born of Yahuah Himself. The natural birth makes a man a son of Adam. The new birth makes him a son of Yahuah. Sonship restored. Image restored. It is the same restoration.

2 Corinthians 5:17 — “Therefore if any man be in Messiah, he is a new creature: old things are passed away; behold, all things are become new.”

Paul does not say the believer is gradually becoming a new creation. He says he is. Present tense. Done. The moment a man is born again, the old Adam dies with the Messiah and a new man is raised with Him. The fallen image goes in the grave. The restored image is put on. This is what Paul means when he says, “I am crucified with Messiah: nevertheless I live; yet not I, but Messiah liveth in me” (Galatians 2:20). Two images, one trade — exchanged in the moment of trust.

Colossians 3:10 — “And have put on the new man, which is renewed in knowledge after the image of him that created him.”

Notice the wording. “The image of him that created him.” That is a direct echo of Genesis 1:26. The new man is renewed after the same image Adam wore in the garden. Not a partial image. Not pieces of an image. The full image, restored at the new birth.

Walking Out the Image You Already Have

If the image is fully restored at the new birth, what do the verses about being “changed from glory to glory” (2 Corinthians 3:18) and being “conformed to the image of his Son” (Romans 8:29) mean? They are not the slow assembly of an image. They are the walking-out of an image already given. The believer learns to think, speak, act, and trust in line with the new image he has already received.

Think of a son adopted by a king. The moment of adoption is decisive — he IS the king’s son, fully and immediately. But learning to walk like a prince, speak like a prince, live in the palace as he ought — that takes a lifetime. The status is instant. The lived expression takes time. The image is the same. Restored fully at the new birth. Worked out from glory to glory.

The Bodily Completion at the First Resurrection

There is one more piece. The image was lost in two ways at the fall — the spiritual (broken communion, sinful nature) and the bodily (mortality, decay, death). The new birth restores the spiritual image now. The bodily completion comes at the resurrection.

1 Corinthians 15:49 — “And as we have borne the image of the earthy, we shall also bear the image of the heavenly.”

Paul speaks in two tenses. We HAVE borne the earthy image — past, completed. The fallen Adamic image of mortality and corruption. We SHALL bear the heavenly image — future, promised. The resurrection body of the Second Adam. This is what Revelation 20 calls the first resurrection. Your spirit has already been raised with the Messiah at the new birth. Your body waits for His return.

Revelation 20:6 — “Blessed and holy is he that hath part in the first resurrection: on such the second death hath no power.”

The believer has already shared in the Messiah’s death and resurrection at the new birth. He has already passed from death to life. So the second death — the final judgment — has no claim on him. The bodily completion at the first resurrection makes visible what is already true. The image was fully restored the moment he trusted. The body just has to catch up.

Conclusion

Every human being alive today bears one of two images. There is no middle ground. The natural birth puts the fallen Adamic image on every person without their consent — the same image Seth inherited from Adam in Genesis 5:3, the same image Romans 1 says man exchanged the Father’s glory for, the same image Revelation calls the image of the beast. Until a new image is put on, the fallen image remains.

The new birth puts the image of Yahuah back on the believer through union with the Second Adam. Not in pieces. Not gradually. Immediately. The old man dies with the Messiah. The new man rises with Him. The believer is a new creation in that moment, and the image he bears is the same image Adam wore in the garden before the fall. What follows in his life is the working-out of an image already given. The final bodily completion comes at the first resurrection, when this mortal puts on immortality.

Here is the heart of it. The image is the sonship. Adam was Yahuah’s son in the garden. Adam fell, and his son Seth inherited a fallen sonship — sonship of Adam, not sonship of the Father. The Second Adam came as the perfect Son to put right what the first Adam broke. And every man who trusts Him is born again as a son of Yahuah, bearing the image of the Father once more.

Stamped in Eden. Lost at the fall. Counterfeited by the beast. Restored through the Second Adam. Worn forever by every man who trusts Him. That is what “the image of God” means in the whole Bible. And once you see it, the whole gospel makes a kind of sense it never made before.

“As for me, I will behold thy face in righteousness: I shall be satisfied, when I awake, with thy likeness.”

— Psalm 17:15