I Am the Resurrection and the Life — John 11:25
CHAPTER 1
A Rebuttal of the Trinitarian Reading of John 11:25
An Examination of Text, Context, and the Principle of Divine Agency
Trinitarian Argument Strength: ★★☆☆☆ 2 out of 5
The “I am” statement has surface-level appeal, but the same Gospel provides the interpretive key (John 5:26) and Yahushua himself prays before the miracle (John 11:41–42), collapsing the claim that he acted by inherent divine power.
Part One
Framing the Problem
1.1 — The Trinitarian Claim
Trinitarian teachers use John 11:25 to argue that Yahushua (Jesus) is Yahuah (God) in the flesh. Their argument is straightforward. Yahushua does not say he brings resurrection or points to life. He says he is the resurrection and the life. They take this as a claim about his nature — not simply a description of his role.
Their case rests on four main pillars. First, they point to the Old Testament, where power over life and death belongs to Yahuah alone. Second, they link the “I am” statements in John back to Exodus 3:14, where Yahuah says “I AM THAT I AM.” Third, they claim Yahushua raised Lazarus by his own built-in divine power, unlike the prophets who had to pray. Fourth, they argue that making belief “in me” the condition for eternal life is something only Yahuah could do.
1.2 — The Problems Before We Even Open the Text
Before we examine a single verse, two problems already undermine this reading. If Yahushua is Yahuah, why does the same Gospel record him saying, “The Son can do nothing of himself” (John 5:19)? And why does Yahushua, just moments before calling Lazarus out of the tomb, look up to heaven and pray, “Father, I thank thee that thou hast heard me” (John 11:41)? A being who is Yahuah does not pray to Yahuah for power he already has.
These are not minor details. They sit in the same Gospel, the same chapter, and in one case the same scene. Any honest reading of John 11:25 must account for them. As we will see, every Trinitarian argument collapses when measured against what Yahushua himself says about where his authority comes from.
Part Two
Verse-by-Verse Examination
2.1 — “I Am the Resurrection and the Life” — Role, Not Nature
Yahushua makes seven “I am” statements in John’s Gospel. Not one of them is a claim to be Yahuah. Every single one describes his appointed role as the Messiah. He says, “I am the bread of life” (John 6:35), “I am the light of the world” (John 8:12), “I am the door” (John 10:9), “I am the good shepherd” (John 10:11), “I am the resurrection, and the life” (John 11:25), “I am the way, the truth, and the life” (John 14:6), and “I am the true vine” (John 15:1).
Here is a simple test. Does any Trinitarian argue that Yahushua is literally a door? That he is literally a vine? That he is literally a loaf of bread? Of course not. Everyone agrees these are role statements. He is the door through whom people reach Yahuah. He is the vine through whom spiritual life flows from the Father.
By the same rule, “I am the resurrection and the life” means Yahushua is the one through whom Yahuah brings resurrection and grants eternal life. He is the appointed channel, not the original source.
The Old Testament Pattern: Agents “Are” What They Stand For
This way of speaking runs deep in Hebrew thought. An agent can be called the very thing he represents. The passover lamb “is” the LORD’s passover:
Exodus 12:11 — “It is the LORD’s passover.”
Nobody thinks the lamb literally is Yahuah’s act of passing over. It stands for it. Joseph told Pharaoh, “The seven good kine are seven years” (Genesis 41:26). The cows are not literally years. They represent them. Ezekiel writes, “These bones are the whole house of Israel” (Ezekiel 37:11). The bones are not literally the nation. They picture Yahuah’s plan for the nation.
Yahushua, as the appointed Messiah, is the resurrection and the life the same way the passover lamb is the passover. He is Yahuah’s chosen way of making it happen.
2.2 — The “I Am” / Exodus 3:14 Connection Does Not Hold Up
Trinitarians try to link every “I am” statement in John to Exodus 3:14, where Yahuah says “I AM THAT I AM.” This connection falls apart on several levels.
The Greek phrase “ego eimi” is simply the normal way any person says “I am.” It is basic grammar, not a divine title. Every “I am” statement in John has an object attached: “I am the bread,” “I am the door,” “I am the resurrection.” These describe a role. The blind man in John 9:9 says “ego eimi” when asked if he was the one born blind. Nobody claims the blind man was declaring himself to be Yahuah.
The Greek Old Testament (Septuagint) translates Exodus 3:14 as “ego eimi ho on” — “I am THE BEING” or “I am THE EXISTING ONE.” That is not what Yahushua says in John 11:25 or in any of the seven statements. His words are predicated — “I am the resurrection” — telling us his function, not his raw identity as the God of the burning bush.
Most importantly, Yahushua himself tells us where his words come from:
John 8:28 — “When ye have lifted up the Son of man, then shall ye know that I am he, and that I do nothing of myself; but as my Father hath taught me, I speak these things.”
John 12:49 — “For I have not spoken of myself; but the Father which sent me, he gave me a commandment, what I should say, and what I should speak.”
Think about that. If Yahushua’s “I am” statements were claims to be Yahuah, why does he say the Father taught him what to say? A being who IS Yahuah does not need someone else to tell him what to declare about himself.
2.3 — The Lazarus Miracle Proves the Non-Trinitarian View
This may be the strongest rebuttal of all. Trinitarians say Yahushua raised Lazarus by his own built-in divine power. But Yahushua himself says the opposite.
Yahushua Prays Before the Miracle
Pay close attention to what happens right before “Lazarus, come forth”:
John 11:41–42 — “And Jesus lifted up his eyes, and said, Father, I thank thee that thou hast heard me. And I knew that thou hearest me always: but because of the people which stand by I said it, that they may believe that thou hast sent me.”
Notice what Yahushua reveals in this prayer. He addresses the Father as a separate person. He thanks the Father for hearing him — the Greek word “ēkousas” means “you received and responded to my request.” You do not thank yourself for hearing yourself. He says “thou hearest me always,” revealing an ongoing pattern: Yahushua regularly makes requests and the Father always answers. That is how an agent works under authority. And the whole purpose of the miracle is so the crowd believes the Father sent him.
Even when Yahushua speaks of having power over his own life and death, he grounds it in something he received:
John 10:17–18 — “I have power to lay it down, and I have power to take it again. This commandment have I received of my Father.”
That is delegated authority, not self-starting deity.
The Old Testament Confirms the Pattern
Elijah and Elisha also raised the dead. They prayed to Yahuah, and Yahuah answered through them:
1 Kings 17:20–22 — Elijah “cried unto the LORD, and said, O LORD my God, I pray thee, let this child’s soul come into him again.” And the LORD heard the voice of Elijah, and the soul of the child came into him again.
2 Kings 4:32–35 — Elisha prayed to the LORD, and the Shunammite’s son was raised.
Trinitarians try to separate Yahushua from the prophets by saying he commanded while the prophets prayed. But Yahushua also prayed (John 11:41–42). The difference is not one of nature. It is one of rank. Yahushua had a greater measure of authority as Yahuah’s ultimate agent — the Messiah, not merely a prophet.
Peter Confirms Yahuah Worked Through Yahushua
On the day of Pentecost, the apostle Peter gives us the plain reading:
Acts 2:22 — “Ye men of Israel, hear these words; Jesus of Nazareth, a man approved of God among you by miracles and wonders and signs, which God did by him in the midst of you.”
Peter does not say “miracles Yahushua did as God.” He says miracles which Yahuah did through him. That covers every miracle, including Lazarus. Peter says the same thing again in Acts 10:38: “God anointed Jesus of Nazareth with the Holy Ghost and with power: who went about doing good, and healing all that were oppressed of the devil; for God was with him.” The power came through anointing. Yahuah was with him — a phrase that makes no sense if Yahushua is Yahuah.
2.4 — “Belief in Me” Does Not Require the Object to Be Yahuah
The Old Testament directly breaks this Trinitarian claim. Israel was commanded to believe in human agents:
Exodus 14:31 — “And Israel saw that great work which the LORD did upon the Egyptians: and the people feared the LORD, and believed the LORD, and his servant Moses.”
2 Chronicles 20:20 — “Believe in the LORD your God, so shall ye be established; believe his prophets, so shall ye prosper.”
Does believing in Moses make Moses Yahuah? Does believing the prophets make them Yahuah? Believing in someone means trusting the role, authority, and message Yahuah gave them. Yahushua is the ultimate appointed agent — the Messiah. Believing in him is how you receive what the sender (Yahuah the Father) offers through him.
Yahushua himself makes this distinction crystal clear:
John 12:44 — “Jesus cried and said, He that believeth on me, believeth not on me, but on him that sent me.”
John 14:1 — “Ye believe in God, believe also in me.”
In John 12:44, believing in Yahushua really means believing in the one who sent him. The trust flows through the agent to the sender. In John 14:1, Yahushua puts belief in Yahuah and belief in himself side by side as two separate things. If Yahushua is Yahuah, that separation makes no sense.
Part Three
The Key Verse That Unlocks Everything
3.1 — John 5:26 — The Father Gave the Son Life in Himself
This single verse wrecks the entire Trinitarian reading of John 11:25. In the very same Gospel, Yahushua tells us exactly where his authority over life came from:
John 5:26 — “For as the Father hath life in himself; so hath he GIVEN to the Son to have life in himself.”
Read that again slowly. The Father has life in himself — that is built-in, inherent, always was. The Son has life in himself because it was given to him. The Greek word is “edoken” — he gave, handed over, granted. This is not two equals sharing the same thing. This is a gift from a greater to a lesser.
This is the key that unlocks John 11:25. When Yahushua says “I am the resurrection and the life,” he speaks from authority that was given to him by the Father. He holds that role because the Father granted it.
3.2 — The Context of John 5 Hammers This Home
The verses surrounding John 5:26 make the delegation unmistakable:
John 5:19 — “The Son can do nothing of himself, but what he seeth the Father do.”
John 5:27 — “And hath given him authority to execute judgment also, because he is the Son of man.”
John 5:30 — “I can of mine own self do nothing: as I hear, I judge: and my judgment is just; because I seek not mine own will, but the will of the Father which hath sent me.”
Three times in one chapter, Yahushua says he can do nothing by himself. Life, judgment, authority — all of it was given to him by the Father. Someone who has equal, built-in divine power does not say “I can do nothing of myself.”
Acts 17:31 puts the same structure in plain terms: Yahuah “hath appointed a day, in the which he will judge the world in righteousness by that man whom he hath ordained.” Yahuah is the Judge. The Son is the appointed agent who carries it out.
Part Four
Supporting Evidence and Broader Patterns
4.1 — Yahuah Alone Is the Source — and He Works Through Agents
Trinitarians are right that the Old Testament gives the power of life and death to Yahuah alone. But they miss what this actually proves.
Deuteronomy 32:39 — “See now that I, even I, am he, and there is no god with me: I kill, and I make alive; I wound, and I heal.”
1 Samuel 2:6 — “The LORD killeth, and maketh alive: he bringeth down to the grave, and bringeth up.”
We do not argue with this. Resurrection power belongs to Yahuah alone. The real question is: how does Yahuah use that power? The Bible answers: through appointed agents. Elijah raised the dead (1 Kings 17:22). Elisha raised the dead (2 Kings 4:35). A dead man came back to life after touching Elisha’s bones — Yahuah’s power flowing through Elisha’s agency even after Elisha himself was dead (2 Kings 13:21).
Yahushua is the greatest of all Yahuah’s agents — the one to whom Yahuah gave all authority. But the pattern is the same: Yahuah’s power, the Messiah’s agency.
Paul confirms this order. In 1 Corinthians 15:21–22, resurrection comes “by man.” In 1 Corinthians 15:27–28, Yahuah puts all things under the Son, and then the Son hands it all back so “God may be all in all.” The Son’s authority is real, but it is granted and ordered under the one God.
4.2 — You Cannot Receive What You Already Have
Matthew 28:18 — “All power is GIVEN unto me in heaven and in earth.”
If Yahushua is co-equal Yahuah, he already has all power by nature. You do not receive what you already own. The Greek word “edothe” is passive — it was given to him by someone else. This is the language of being handed a role, not of being equal to the one who hands it.
4.3 — John 17:3 — Yahushua Separates Himself from the Only True God
John 17:3 — “And this is life eternal, that they might know thee the only true God, AND Jesus Christ, whom thou hast sent.”
Notice the structure. Eternal life means knowing two separate persons — the Father and Yahushua the Messiah. The Father is called “the only true God” — in the Greek, “monon alethinon theon” (the alone true God). Yahushua calls himself the one sent by that only true God. You cannot be both the sender and the sent. You cannot call someone else “the only true God” while also being that same God. Yahushua’s own words put him in the role of the authorized agent — the exact role that explains John 11:25.
4.4 — Martha’s Answer Confirms the Non-Trinitarian Reading
After Yahushua says “I am the resurrection and the life,” he asks Martha a direct question: “Believest thou this?” Her answer is one of the most important and most overlooked details in this passage:
John 11:27 — “She saith unto him, Yea, Lord: I believe that thou art the Christ, the Son of God, which should come into the world.”
Notice what Martha did not say. She did not say, “I believe you are Yahuah.” She did not say, “I believe you are the second person of the Trinity.” What she did say was: “You are the Messiah, the Son of Yahuah, who was to come into the world.”
Martha understood perfectly. Yahushua’s claim to be the resurrection and the life was a messianic claim — a claim to be Yahuah’s appointed agent through whom resurrection and life would come. It was not a claim to be Yahuah himself. And here is the clincher: Yahushua accepted her answer. He did not correct her. He did not say, “No Martha, I am telling you I am Yahuah.” Her confession was exactly what his statement called for.
“Son of God” in the Old Testament was a royal title for the King of Israel. Yahuah said of David’s heir, “I will be his father, and he shall be my son” (2 Samuel 7:14). The Psalmist records, “Thou art my Son; this day have I begotten thee” (Psalm 2:7). And again, “He shall cry unto me, Thou art my father, my God…Also I will make him my firstborn” (Psalm 89:26–27). The title meant appointment and relationship, not deity. Martha’s confession comes straight from this Old Testament understanding.
Part Five
Summary and Conclusion
5.1 — What the Text Actually Says
When Yahushua declares “I am the resurrection and the life,” he is claiming his appointed role as the Messiah — the one through whom the Father brings resurrection and grants eternal life. The Father gave him life in himself (John 5:26). The Father gave him authority over judgment (John 5:27). The Father gave him all power in heaven and earth (Matthew 28:18). He can do nothing of himself (John 5:19, 30). He prays to the Father before raising Lazarus and thanks him for hearing (John 11:41–42). The whole miracle was done so the crowd would believe the Father sent him. Peter confirms that Yahuah did miracles through Yahushua (Acts 2:22) and that Yahuah anointed him with power (Acts 10:38). Martha’s response — “You are the Messiah, the Son of Yahuah” — was accepted as the correct understanding of his words.
5.2 — What the Trinitarian Reading Requires
To make John 11:25 a proof of the Trinity, you must ignore Yahushua’s own words that he can do nothing of himself. You must ignore his prayer thanking the Father for hearing him. You must ignore his statement that the Father taught him what to say. You must ignore Peter’s testimony that Yahuah worked through Yahushua. You must ignore Martha’s confession, which Yahushua accepted, calling him the Messiah rather than Yahuah. You must ignore the plain statement in John 5:26 that the Father gave the Son life in himself. And you must ignore Yahushua’s own identification of the Father as “the only true God” in John 17:3.
In short, the Trinitarian reading of John 11:25 requires you to ignore John 5, John 8, John 10, John 11, John 12, John 14, John 17, Acts 2, Acts 10, Acts 17, 1 Corinthians 15, and Matthew 28 — all to preserve a doctrine that the text never states and that the speaker himself contradicts.
5.3 — Conclusion
John 11:25 does not prove a Trinity. It proves a Father who gave all authority to His Son, and a Son who faithfully carries out that authority on behalf of His Father. Two persons. One purpose. One God — the Father. As the Shema has always declared: “Hear, O Israel: Yahuah our God, Yahuah is one” (Deuteronomy 6:4).
◆
If Yahushua possessed inherent divine power over life and death, he would not have looked up to heaven and thanked someone else for hearing his request before calling Lazarus out of the tomb.