The Law & The Feasts

Ye Have Heard

Six quotations, and one of them Yahuah never said.

“Ye shall not add unto the word which I command you, neither shall ye diminish ought from it.”
Deuteronomy 4:2
Nazaryah
5 min read

The Formula Nobody Reads Closely

Six times in Matthew 5 Yahushua opens with “Ye have heard that it was said,” and six times answers with “but I say unto you.” The modern reading takes that as Messiah against Moses, six rounds of the new covenant overruling the old. The formula itself refuses that reading.

When Yahushua quotes Scripture as Scripture, He says it is written, three times to the adversary in the wilderness without varying it (Matthew 4:4, 7, 10). Here He does not. He says it was said, and the first time He adds by whom: “said by them of old time” (Matthew 5:21). He is quoting what the crowd had been taught, not what Yahuah had spoken, and the whole passage turns on that difference.

The Sixth One Proves It

“Ye have heard that it hath been said, Thou shalt love thy neighbour, and hate thine enemy” (Matthew 5:43). The first half is Leviticus 19:18. The second half is not in the Torah. It is not in the Prophets. It is not anywhere in Scripture. Someone attached it.

That clause settles the argument. If even one of the six quotations contains something Yahuah never said, Yahushua is not correcting the Law; He is correcting men who added to it, which Yahuah forbade twice (Deuteronomy 4:2; 12:32). The Law had already ruled the other way: “If thine enemy be hungry, give him bread to eat” (Proverbs 25:21; also Exodus 23:4).

Every Answer Goes Deeper, Never Lighter

Look at what the six answers actually do:

Murder is answered with anger, already forbidden: “Thou shalt not hate thy brother in thine heart” (Leviticus 19:17).

Adultery is answered with lust, already forbidden: “Thou shalt not covet thy neighbour’s wife” (Exodus 20:17).

Divorce is answered by narrowing a concession. Deuteronomy 24:1-4 restrained a practice the schools had widened into a permission slip.

Oaths are answered by killing the loophole ladder, not the vow. The Law commands a man to perform what he vowed (Numbers 30:2); the scribes had built tiers of binding and non-binding swearing (Matthew 23:16-22).

Eye for eye is answered by returning it to the courtroom it came from.

Love thy neighbour is answered by stripping off the clause men added to it.

Not one of the six lowers a standard. Every answer raises it. A law is not abolished by being tightened.

The Altar and the Adversary

Two more sayings sit inside the murder block, and both are altar and courtroom procedure. “If thou bring thy gift to the altar, and there rememberest that thy brother hath ought against thee… first be reconciled to thy brother, and then come and offer thy gift” (Matthew 5:23-24). That order was already the Law: restitution to the man wronged came first, the trespass offering second (Leviticus 6:1-7).

“Agree with thine adversary quickly, whiles thou art in the way with him” (Matthew 5:25). Solomon said the same: “debate thy cause with thy neighbour himself” (Proverbs 25:8-9). Both sayings put the offended man ahead of the offering, which is where Leviticus had already put him.

Eye for Eye Was Never Yours

The phrase appears three times, and all three sit in judicial context (Exodus 21:22-24; Leviticus 24:20; Deuteronomy 19:17-21, where the matter goes before the priests and the judges under diligent inquiry). It is a sentencing limit that stops a court from taking a life for a tooth and stops a family from escalating a feud. It was never a license for a man to settle his own accounts: “Thou shalt not avenge, nor bear any grudge” (Leviticus 19:18), the same verse the sixth quotation mangles.

The Heart Was Always the Point

The claim that the old commands were external and Messiah made them internal cannot survive a reading of the Torah. “Thou shalt love Yahuah thy God with all thine heart… and these words, which I command thee this day, shall be in thine heart” (Deuteronomy 6:5-6). “Circumcise therefore the foreskin of your heart” (Deuteronomy 10:16; also Psalm 37:31; 40:8). Yahushua was not installing something new. He was restoring what the teachers had traded for an outward performance.

Be Ye Therefore Perfect

The section closes on a line the pulpit treats as an impossible standard: “Be ye therefore perfect, even as your Father which is in heaven is perfect” (Matthew 5:48). The word behind it is tamim, whole, complete, undivided, used of an offering without defect (Leviticus 22:21). Moses gave the command in the same words: “Thou shalt be perfect with Yahuah thy God” (Deuteronomy 18:13), and Yahuah said it to Abram first (Genesis 17:1). It closes the six exactly where they began, inside the Torah.

Where the Pulpit Buried It

The standard teaching calls this passage the six antitheses, a word meaning opposition, and the label does the work before the reader arrives. Once the section is called opposition, every sentence reads as Messiah against Moses, and the conclusion is written before the text is opened.

Read without the label, the section is a man taking six commands back from those who trimmed them, padded them, and moved them outdoors. He puts each one back where the Law had it, in the heart. That is not opposition. That is repair.

One of ten witnesses to a single sermon. This one is the added — what men hung on the commandments, taken back off them one at a time. The Law and the Prophets are named at both ends of the mountain, and the case they close is set out in the nucleus study, The Mountain Message Christianity Never Preached.